Information on the culture of the Red claw crayfish from the FAO Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. IdentityCherax quadricarinatus von Martens, 1868 [Parastacidae]FAO Names: En - Red Claw Crayfish, Fr - , Es -Biological FeaturesRelatively
large freshwater crayfish, smooth lustrous deep blue to green shell,
with males exhibiting bright red colouring on the margins of their large
claws. Males can reach a maximum weight of 500 g and females 400 g.
Juveniles (less than 20 to 30 g) can be sexually distinguished by the
gonopore position, adjacent to the fifth pereiopods (walking legs) for
males and third legs for females. Distinguished from other crayfish by
size, colour and the presence of four distinct anterior ridges (carinae)
of the carapace. Images GalleryProfileHistorical BackgroundThe
red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus, referred to throughout the
rest of this fact sheet simply by its Australian synonym ‘redclaw’, is a
tropical species native to the rivers of north-west Queensland and the
Northern Territory in Australia. Although well known to the local
inhabitants of this isolated region, it remained effectively unknown to
the rest of the world until the late 1980s, when it was trialled for
aquaculture. Redclaw proved to be well suited to cultivation, and the
redclaw aquaculture industry was born, developing quickly and spreading
throughout northern Australia, and soon afterwards overseas.
Redclaw
benefits from a host of physical, biological and commercial attributes
that make it an excellent candidate for aquaculture. It is physically
robust with broad geographic potential, has a simple life-cycle and
straightforward production technology, requires low protein diet and is
economic to produce. Its texture and flavour compares very favourably
with commonly eaten marine crustaceans and, having the appearance of a
lobster, is positioned at the premium end of the crustacean market
spectrum.
Although indigenous to Australia, redclaw has been
exported to many other countries where commercial production has now
been established. Production technologies, while still evolving, are at a
stage where ‘best management practice’ methods have been identified.
These technologies are relatively straightforward and the skill levels
required of practitioners are not onerous.
Redclaw aquaculture
has been established now for more than 25 years, and yet total
production is still quite small. This is despite many projections that
it would become a significant aquaculture species worldwide, and
possibly a rival of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium
rosenbergii).
Main Producer CountriesBesides
the producing countries shown in the map based on FAO statistical
returns, redclaw farming activities are also known to exist in Belize,
China, Indonesia, Israel, Morocco, Panama, Spain and the United States
of America. Unconfirmed reports of interest in several other countries
also exist. Main producer countries of Cherax quadricarinatus (FAO Fishery Statistics, 2008) Habitat and BiologyRedclaw
is native to the upper reaches of rivers in northeastern Australia, and
in Papua New Guinea. Its preferred habitat is in high turbidity, slow
moving streams or static water holes (billabongs) that characterise the
rivers in that region. These are flushed seasonally with monsoonal wet
season rains, which may wash the redclaw downstream. Redclaw display a
strong tendency to move upstream to the preferred habitat, and to avoid
being stranded in the lower river reaches that often dry up in the dry
season. Its adaptation to the natural habitat has generated a host of
biological attributes that are well suited to aquaculture, as summarised
below: - Breeds easily, with no larval stage development.
- Potential for selective breeding; many wild population strains.
- Tolerates high stocking densities.
- Requires low protein diet, not reliant on fishmeal.
- Market position as a high value crustacean.
- Flesh texture and flavour compares favourably with other crustaceans.
- Meat recovery rate acceptable.
- Reaches commercial size in nine months grow-out.
- Survives well out of water for transport to market.
- Straightforward production technology.
- Tolerant
of variations in water quality - low dissolved oxygen, wide daily pH
changes, low alkalinity, temperature variations, high nutrient loads.
- Tolerates
saline water up to 5 ‰ indefinitely and up to 15 ‰ for several days.
This provides broad geographic potential and a means of enhancing
flavour, purging and cleaning before sending to market.
- No destructive burrowing.
- Non aggressive – cannibalism not regarded as an issue.
Redclaw
is a tropical species endemic to northeastern Australia. The harsh
physical extremes of this distribution have given this species a robust
nature with broad climatic tolerances. Its preferred temperature range
is 23 ºC to 31 ºC and it will perish at <10 ºC and >36 ºC.
Reproduction will only occur while water temperature remains above 23
ºC.
Female redclaw brood their eggs for six-ten weeks, depending on
temperature. Most produce between 300 and 800 eggs per brood. There may
be between three to five broods during the breeding season. Hatchlings
resemble the adult form and remain attached to the underside of the
female for several weeks before progressively becoming independent.
Production
Production Cycle
Production cycle of Cherax quadricarinatus
Production Systems
Seed Supply
Selected berried females or mature broodstock from
the harvests of grow-out ponds are stocked into juvenile rearing ponds.
Breeding and production of seed occurs naturally during the summer
months, when temperatures are >25 ºC.
Hatchery Production
There is no hatchery production. Redclaws are reared directly in the juvenile ponds.
Juvenile Production
Juvenile production and grow-out to market size are managed
separately, although both are performed in earthen ponds. A managed
juvenile production programme is essential to provide the advanced
juveniles required for grow-out, and to make effective use of the
superior broodstock selected. Depending on temperature and whether
berried females or mature broodstock are used, a culture period of 3 to 4
months is necessary to achieve a mean size of juveniles of 5 to 15 g.
The two most critical factors in juvenile production are the provision
of shelter and food. The general management of juvenile rearing ponds is
the same as that described in this fact sheet under ongrowing
techniques.
Typically juvenile ponds are stocked with mature females and males
at a ratio of 4:1 and a density of 1 500/ha, carefully selected as the
best of the stock available from grow-out harvest. Under well managed
conditions, 50-100 advanced juveniles will be produced per broodstock
female, providing a yield of 60 000 to 120 000 juveniles/ha.
At water temperatures above 25 ºC, a juvenile production pond
stocked with male and female broodstock is ready for harvest in four
months. Alternatively, when berried females are stocked, the juvenile
production pond is ready to harvest in three months. To maximise
survival and growth of the juvenile redclaw, an abundance of shelter in
the ponds is essential. This is usually provided in the form of bundles
of synthetic mesh, tied onto a line with a weight at one end and a float
at the other. Arranged in this manner, these bundles extend from the
pond floor up into the water column providing many spaces and surfaces
for the juveniles to utilise. These mesh bundles are stocked at one
every 5 m
2.
Juvenile production ponds are carefully managed to provide an
abundance of planktonic organisms which the juvenile crayfish utilise as
food. The planktonic organisms include both phytoplankton and
zooplankton; it is primarily the latter that are consumed by the
juvenile crayfish. As they grow, they progressively consume less
plankton and more of the detrital food that occurs on the surface of the
shelter material and, more especially, on the mud surface.
Maintaining high levels of plankton involves regular checking of
water quality and periodic fertilisation of the water with nitrogen and
phosphorus (typically diammonium phosphate at 50 kg/ha).
Harvesting of the juveniles is achieved by a number of methods.
Sometimes individual mesh shelters are removed and the juveniles shaken
out. However, the most effective method is to employ a flow trap. With
this method, the pond is completely drained and all the crayfish are
attracted into a trap. From there they can be removed to tanks and
sorted, counted and then stocked into the grow-out ponds.
Ongrowing Techniques
Although all commercial redclaw grow-out occurs in earthen ponds, there is some interest in tank culture.
Ponds
Redclaw aquaculture, both in juvenile and grow-out ponds, is
performed in earthen ponds, typically 0.05 to 0.5 ha, with a depth of
1.0-2.5 m and a V-shape that allows rapid and complete drainage. Water
is sourced from surface supplies or underground and should have a pH of
6.5-8.0, hardness of >40 ppm, and low levels of salinity (<5 ‰)
and metals such as iron and manganese (<0.1 mg/litre).
Artificial shelters are essential; they should be abundant, and
their shape, specification and positioning should permit water to drain
out freely and completely as the pond is drained. Stacks of pipes have
been found to provide the most effective shelter for redclaw in the
grow-out phase. Aeration is also essential and most frequently provided
through airlift pumps, although other forms of aeration such as
paddle-wheels and aspirators may be used. The aeration system should
provide both oxygen input to the water and water circulation from bottom
to top and around the pond. Fencing and netting over ponds is essential
in areas where predatory birds and other species are prevalent.
Grow-out ponds should be prepared with applications of lime,
inorganic fertilisers and some organic material such as hay or manure.
This initiates a plankton bloom, which provides additional, highly
nutritious food and minimises light penetration. Grow-out necessitates
an active stock management approach. Because redclaw breed so readily
and profusely, the pond populations must be managed intensively. This
includes stocking with known numbers of advanced juveniles of at least 5
g. Uniformity of size is very important. Maximum size at stocking
should be 10 g. Stocking densities of 5-15/m
2 are recommended.
The food used will have an important bearing on production.
Commercial crayfish pellets are available and have proven to be
effective. A feeding frequency of once per day is adequate, preferably
at dusk when crayfish are active.
Active management of the pond environment is essential to maximise
yields. There should be weekly monitoring of pH, dissolved oxygen and
transparency (secchi disk) and monthly monitoring of hardness,
alkalinity and ammonia. All measurements must be made at the water /
soil interface on the bottom, and a contingency plan must be developed
to counter poor water quality by applications of lime or fertiliser, or
flushing of the pond with fresh water.
Drying both juvenile and grow-out ponds between crops is essential
to sterilise and re-vitalise the bottom. There is often a considerable
build-up of organic waste after a culture period. The most effective
management is to dry the pond for one to two weeks until cracks appear.
Toxic compounds are broken down and useful nutrients are released.
Crayfish may be manually sexed and stocked into separate ponds,
particularly those that are to be grown out to >50 g. Avoiding, or at
least minimising reproduction in grow-out ponds is important in
effective management.
Protection against birds, rats and eels, and any other potential
predators must be provided. Complete enclosure netting and fencing is
essential. Recent economic analysis indicated that the cost of netting
(including materials and installation) is equivalent to 15 percent of
the value of one crop. As losses to predators may be well in excess of
this, netting is very cost-effective.
The maximum grow-out period without grading should be six to nine
months to minimise the possibility of un-managed reproduction. At each
harvest, the stock must be size-graded and re-distributed as breeding
stock, for marketing, for further grow-out or to be culled and
discarded. The runts of each crop are unlikely to achieve market size in
a reasonable time and it is best to remove them (and therefore their
inferior genetics) from the farm population. The key factors for redclaw
grow-out are: maximise growth and survival, and avoid reproduction. If
these principles are applied, an average yield of more than 5
tonnes/ha/crop should be achieved.
Tanks
Despite the focus of redclaw grow-out being earthen pond systems,
there has been regular interest in the use of tank systems. These
require only a modest investment in comparison with pond construction,
and have therefore attracted great attention. Unfortunately, tank
systems are not likely to provide profitable returns. Redclaw obtains
the bulk of its food from decaying matter and associated microbes
contained in the pond bottom mud. Although manufactured feeds have been
developed for redclaw they do not appear to sustain acceptable growth
rates in tank systems.
Similarly, juvenile redclaw, which have slightly different feeding
habits to the adults, cannot be cultured successfully in tanks because
appropriate food cannot be provided. As a result, the juvenile redclaw
become cannibalistic, leaving very few survivors.
The level of production likely from redclaw culture in tanks would
return considerably less than the operating costs, and certainly far
less than the setup costs.
Efforts to develop successful commercial tank systems for the
cultivation of freshwater crayfish have a considerable history. Both in
Australia and overseas, years of work have been applied to this
approach, and yet the only commercially viable operations for redclaw
are earthen pond based. There exists no confirmed or documented case of
commercial success for crayfish production in a tank system.
Feed Supply
Commercial crayfish pellets are available in some
countries, although in many cases pellets formulated for other species
are used. The most effective have a protein content of ~25 percent and a
lipid content of 8 percent, and are composed primarily of grains. Use
of a feeding schedule is critical. Suitable alternatives to crayfish
pellets include freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium) or fish pellets.
Harvesting Techniques
Harvesting may involve a number of methods, although
the most effective is the use of a flow-trap; this exploits the strong
response of redclaws to flowing water. A slow but steady flow of water
into the pond via a box and ramp illicit movement of crayfish against
the flow and into the box. Flow-trapping should involve 95 percent
drainage of the pond over 24 hours from dawn to dawn. There should be
several thousand litres of water remaining in the deepest part of the
pond at dawn, when the redclaw are removed. This slow drainage enables
the crayfish to move out of shelters and with the main body of water, so
that they concentrate and respond most effectively to the flow trap.
Both the flow trap and the last remaining water must be well aerated or
the entire harvest may easily be lost. The stock should be quickly
removed and transported to clean water in a tank system. Care should be
taken to minimise crushing by not exceeding 15 kg of stock per transport
container (typically a 60 x 40 x 40 cm fish basket).
Other harvesting methods include bait trapping and drain harvesting with manual collection of stock.
Handling and Processing
The majority of redclaw are sold live; thus after
harvesting stock they are held in tanks with flow-through water supply
or a recirculation system involving biological filtration. A period of
at least 24 hours in the tank to permit purging of the gut is
recommended prior to packing for transport. Redclaw can survive extended
periods out of water provided they are kept cool and moist. Packing
therefore involves insulated containers containing some moist packing
material (foam rubber or wood shavings) and cooling packs.
Production Costs
A redclaw aquaculture economic model has been
developed with data gathered from commercial farms. This model involves a
farm size of forty 1 000 m2 grow-out ponds and seven 1 000 m2
juvenile production ponds, representing a total pond area of 4.7
hectares. The financial evaluation uses a discounted cash flow technique
over a 20 year period.
The model farm was assumed to annually harvest 394 kg of redclaw per
grow-out pond from year two onwards. Redclaw were estimated to take
nine months to reach the acceptable market size of 65 g mean weight. At
this weight the farm-gate price was estimated to be US$12.50/kg.
Initial establishment of the model farm was estimated to cost US$325
000. Included in this cost were land, hired labour, machinery and all
farm infrastructure costs. Specifications for the farm layout and pond
characteristics were based on ‘best management practice’
recommendations.
In this model farm, redclaw aquaculture was profitable, providing a
profit of US$4.91/kg/year. The total costs of production were estimated
to be US$7.71/kg/year. Included in these costs were all operating costs,
capital costs and allowance for the owner’s labour and management. The
discounted payback period, which represents the time to recover the
initial outlay, was four years.
Sensitivity analyses for prices and yield showed that, at the annual
yield of 394 kg per grow-out pond, the minimum price for the investment
to be profitable was US$7.71/kg. Similarly, at an assumed price of
US$12.50/kg, the minimum annual yield required to be profitable was 2
320 kg/ha.
Grow-out periods may vary between 6 months and 15 months depending
on the redclaw market weight the grower intends selling. Redclaw market
weights and prices were assumed to increase with longer turnoff periods.
Based on a sensitivity analysis which compared various grow-out
periods, the most profitable option was 9 months and the least
profitable was 12 months. The results from this analysis were very
sensitive to prices, survival rates and market weights. Survival rates
and market weights are strongly correlated to farm management expertise.
Results from established farms applying best practice techniques
confirm that the economics of the model are a true and accurate
representation of commercial redclaw aquaculture.
Diseases and Control Measures
Several potentially disease causing organisms,
including protozoans, bacteria and viruses, have been identified in
redclaw. All have been implicated at one time or another in some
mortality or poor production from specific farms, although there has
never been any documented widespread outbreak of disease. Farmers are
well aware that careful quarantining and good health monitoring and
management will minimise the risk of disease. By maintaining good
culture conditions that maximise survival and growth, crayfish stress is
managed and the threat of disease minimised.
Disease |
Agent |
Type |
Syndorme |
Measures |
Systemic Rickettsia |
Rickettsia-like organism |
Bacteria |
Lethargy; poor feed response; low growth rate; significant mortality |
For heavy farm infections, complete de-stocking & sterilisation of ponds |
White tail |
Thelohania spp. & others |
Microsporidian |
Abdominal muscle becomes opaque; low prevalence but high mortality |
Uncommon in farm populations; no specific measures |
Redclaw baculovirus |
Cherax quadricarinatus bacilliform virus CqBV |
Virus |
Associated with lethargic & moribund crayfish; high prevalence but low pathogenicity |
No specific measures |
Suppliers of Pathology Expertise
In Australia, the Queensland Government provides a
diagnostic service for farm stocks including redclaw crayfish:
www.deedi.qld.gov.au
Statistics
Production Statistics
Global Aquaculture Production of Cherax Quadricarinatus
(FAO Fishery Statistic)
Annual production of redclaw in Australia has
remained at less than 400 tonnes for the past decade through to 2011.
The regulatory environment in Australia has stifled investment despite
the excellent production credentials of the species.
Meanwhile, in other countries, redclaw production has become
established, but with only minor industry growth. In Mexico there is
possibly around 50 tonnes of production, but less than ten tonnes each
from Belize, Panama and the United States of America. Ecuador at one
stage during the late 1990s had significant redclaw production,
particularly for juveniles to stock new farms but this did not persist,
and total production is currently negligible. Redclaw farms of
substantial scale have been established in Morocco and in Spain, but
production from these locations is unknown.
Redclaw have been cultivated in southern China since the mid 1990s,
although annual production is said to be less then 100 tonnes (it is not
yet specifically recorded in statistical returns to FAO).
Market and Trade
Redclaw are commonly marketed in 20 g size grades
ranging from 30-50 g (at approximately US$9.50/kg) to >120 g (at
approximately US$18.00/kg). The smaller grades are commonly used in
buffet style presentations, with the larger animals featuring in
a-la-carte restaurants, both as entree and main course dishes. In
Australia, export opportunities have been identified through
considerable market research. However, sales to date have been limited
by the small production volume and therefore the risk of inconsistent
supply. At present 60 percent of redclaw are sold within Queensland and
10 percent sold interstate; the remaining 30 percent exported, primarily
to Hong Kong. Production in other countries tends to be marketed
locally.
There are three steps in the marketing chain; producer, wholesaler
and restaurateur. There are effectively no retail sales of the raw
product. While selling direct to restaurants may result in slightly
higher prices, the practice can have a limiting effect on market growth.
A good wholesaler can increase the market penetration of redclaw by
cross-selling while servicing customers from their existing product
lists. Farm-gate sales are substantial; however, the volumes are likely
to decrease as more coordinated marketing through wholesalers develops.
Wholesalers tend to price redclaw lower than marine lobsters but higher
than shrimp. Generally they are marketed alongside slipper lobsters,
small spiny lobsters or small clawed marine lobsters.
A clear marketing attribute for Australian redclaw is its reputation
as a product from clean water, free of medical or chemical additives.
Product is purged prior to sale and is often held in saltwater (up to 15
‰), which improves the flavour and its attractiveness to Asian markets.
Redclaw are mainly sold as a live product, although some processing,
particularly cooking and freezing is undertaken. Fresh redclaw have a
lustrous shell, deep blue to green in colour. Cooked, they have the
bright red appearance typical of premium crustaceans.
Status and Trends
A comprehensive research and development programme
was operated between 1988 and 2000 by the Queensland Government from a
research station at Walkamin. This covered aspects of preliminary
assessment, development of production technology, demonstration farms
and selective breeding. Research programmes have also operated in the
USA (Auburn University, Kentucky State University), Mexico (CIBNOR) and
Israel, some of which remain current. However, while research continues
to provide useful information, particularly in regard to nutrition and
reproduction, it is not a lack of knowledge that is limiting industry
development.
Despite all its positive attributes, the reasons for the lack of
redclaw farming expansion remain uncertain. Clearly, market demand for
such crustaceans remains strong throughout the world, and freshwater
production is generally less exposed to the conflicting resource use
issues that face marine aquaculture. Profitability, based on Australian
farm modelling, appears to be strong. In Australia the regulatory
environment is clearly an obstacle, and the risk of environmental
permits not being issued retards investment. Furthermore, the initial
apparent success of many small farms that were in fact not of an
economically viable scale has resulted in a stagnant industry that is
not attractive to new investment.
In other countries, redclaw farming has similarly failed to gain
momentum. In many cases the species has been translocated to regions
where the climate is simply not suited, such as the USA, where cool
winters are not conducive to profitable production. This applies equally
to many other countries with sub-tropical environments. Redclaw is a
tropical species and thus its farming can only be commercially viable in
locations with a tropical climate. Redclaw farming appeared well suited
to Ecuador where development grew quickly from 1994 through 1998, and
then promptly collapsed. The reason was purported to be low market
price, and therefore lack of profitability.
There have been enough documented cases of high productivity to
verify the production capacity of this species. Similarly, market
research suggests that acceptable farm-gate prices can be achieved for
large volumes that would sustain a viable business. The missing elements
appear to be investment in farms of appropriate scale and site
selection in tropical locations where the climate will support premium
growth. If these criteria are met, redclaw farming may be established
and provide a foundation for substantial growth.
Main Issues
Redclaw farming faces several marketing challenges.
Typical of most new industries, very little promotion has been
undertaken, thus consumer awareness internationally is relatively low.
In Australia the industry is composed of a high number of small
enterprises making the marketing quite fragmented. Localised marketing
groups consisting of several cooperative growers with common purpose
have been trialled with limited success. These have established quality
standards, brand names and promotional material to more effectively
market their collective production in a coordinated manner.
The challenge for industry is to increase production through
expansion and new investment and to lift production volumes to a point
where the substantial quantities required by identified markets can be
consistently supplied.
Redclaw is considered an invasive species, and thus its introduction
into many areas outside its natural distribution is considered risky.
Unfortunately, such translocation has been widespread for more than two
decades, and the impacts of this are now being revealed. To date such
impacts appear to be negligible, there being no documented cases of
significant ecological consequences such the displacement or competitive
exclusion of native species. While the risk remains, and may be
manifested in more subtle ways, strict quarantine and security measures
should be applied to redclaw farming.
The biological characteristics of redclaw are not typical of a
highly invasive species. It has reasonably high sensitivity to low
temperature, which precludes its survival in waters where temperature
falls below 10 ºC. It has a relatively low fecundity and is highly
susceptible to predation. Nevertheless, it is a robust species, and
every effort should be made to avoid its release into natural waterways.
Responsible Aquaculture Practices
The redclaw farming industries around the world are
still too small to garner much attention. The prospect of significant
growth in production of this species is supported by excellent
production characteristics and production systems that are
environmentally sustainable. Freshwater pond based aquaculture, such as
used for redclaw, has a distinct advantage over mariculture, in that the
water can be used before or after the production phase for other
agricultural purposes such the irrigation of crops. Production inputs
tend to be quite organic, and indeed it would take only minor
modification of established practices to meet organic certification
requirements. Although best management practices have been developed and
documented for redclaw that seek to maximise production, there is as
yet no code of practice that specifically incorporates sustainability
issues. As the established methods are already of a highly sustainable
nature, redclaw aquaculture may be an attractive proposition for an
increasingly enlightened rural production sector.
References
Bibliography
Barki, A., Karplus, I., Manor, R.,
Parnes, S., Aflalo, E.D. & Sagi, A. 2006. Growth of redclaw crayfish
(Cherax quadricarinatus) in a three-dimensional compartments system:
Does a neighbor matter? Aquaculture, 252:348-355.
Cortes-Jacinto, E., Villarreal-Colmenares, H., Cruz-Suarez, L.E.,
Civera-Cerecedo, R., Nolasco-Soria, H. & Hernandez-Llamas, A. 2005.
Effect of different dietary protein and lipid levels on growth and
survival of juvenile Australian redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus
(von Martens). Aquaculture Nutrition, 11:283-291.
Evans, L.H. & Edgerton, B.F. 2002. Chapter 10. Pathogens,
Parasites and Commensals. In: D.M. Holdich (ed), Biology of Freshwater
Crayfish, pp. 377-438. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Gutierrez-Yurrita, P.J. 2005. The problem of introducing alien
crayfish. Crayfish News (Newsletter of the International Association of
Astacology), 27(2):12-13.
Holdich, D.M. 2002. Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 702 pp.
Jones, C.M. 1990. The Biology and Aquaculture Potential of the
Tropical Freshwater Crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. Report No.
QI90028. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, Brisbane,
Australia. 109 pp.
Jones, C.M. 1998. Redclaw Crayfish. In: K.W. Hyde (ed), The New
Rural Industries. A Handbook for Farmers and Investors, pp. 127-133.
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Canberra.
Jones, C.M. (ed.). 2000. Redclaw Crayfish Aquaculture. Recommended
Practices for Redclaw Crayfish Aquaculture based on Research and
Development Activities, 1998 through 2000. Cairns, Australia. Queensland
Government, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. 61 pp.
Jones, C.M. & Grady, J. 2000. Redclaw from harvest to market: a
manual of handling procedures. Report No. QI99083. Department of Primary
Industries, Queensland, Brisbane. 36 pp.
Jones, C.M. & Ruscoe I.M. 2000. Assessment of stocking size and
density in the production of redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus
(von Martens) (Decapoda: Parastacidae), cultured under earthen pond
conditions. Aquaculture, 189:63-71.
Jones, C.M., McPhee, C.P. & Ruscoe, I.M. 2000. A review of
genetic improvement in growth rate in redclaw crayfish Cherax
quadricarinatus (von Martens) (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Aquaculture
Research, 31:61-67.
Jones, C.M. & Ruscoe, I.M. 2001. Assessment of five shelter
types in the production of redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus
(Decapoda: Parastacidae) under earthen pond conditions. Journal of the
World Aquaculture Society, 32:41-52.
Lawrence, C. & Jones, C. 2002. Chapter 17. Cherax. In: D.M.
Holdich (ed), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish, pp. 635-670. Blackwell
Science, Oxford.
McPhee, C.P., Jones, C.M. & Shanks, S.A. 2004. Selection for
increased weight at nine months in Redclaw crayfish (Cherax
quadricarinatus). Aquaculture, 237:131-140.
O'Sullivan, D. Fielder, D. & Jones, C. 2003. Chapter 20.
Freshwater Crustaceans. In: J.S. Lucas & P.C. Southgate (eds),
Aquaculture: Farming Aquatic Animals and Plants, pp. 420-442. Blackwell
Publishing Oxford.
Pavasovic, A., Anderson, A.J., Mather, P.B. & Richardson, N.A.
2007. Influence of dietary protein on digestive enzyme activity, growth
and tail muscle composition in redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus
(von Martens). Aquaculture Research, 38:644-652.
Romero, X. 2002. Ups and downs of red claw crayfish farming in Ecuador. World Aquaculture, 33(2):40-46.
Romero, X. & Jimenez, R. 2002. Histopathological survey of
diseases and pathogens present in redclaw crayfish, Cherax
quadricarinatus (Von Martens), cultured in Ecuador. Journal of Fish
Diseases, 25:653-667.
Thompson, K.R., Muzinic, L.A., Engler, L.S., Morton, S.R. &
Webster, C.D. 2004. Effects of feeding practical diets containing
various protein levels on growth, survival, body composition, and
processing traits of Australian red claw crayfish (Cherax
quadricarinatus) and on pond water quality. Aquaculture Research,
35:659-668.
Thompson, K.R., Muzinic, L.A., Engler, L.S. & Webster, C.D.
2005. Evaluation of practical diets containing different protein levels,
with or without fish meal, for juvenile Australian red claw crayfish
(Cherax quadricarinatus). Aquaculture, 244:241-249.
|